ACADEMIC SOURCES

Research and archaeological evidence for Dogs & Jackals

HOW WE VERIFY

Dogs & Jackals presents unique challenges for historical accuracy. Unlike the Royal Game of Ur, no ancient rule tablets survive. Our reconstruction relies on physical evidence, comparative analysis, and experimental archaeology.

1

Archaeological Evidence

Study of 60+ surviving game boards from Egypt and the Near East

2

Comparative Analysis

Cross-reference with other ancient race games like Senet and Mehen

3

Portal Interpretation

Analysis of carved lines connecting holes on original boards

4

Experimental Testing

Playtesting reconstructed rules for balance and engagement

CONTENT MARKERS

VerifiedVerified - Confirmed by primary archaeological sources
ReconstructionReconstruction - Scholarly interpretation of incomplete evidence
DramatizationDramatization - Artistic license for engagement
SimulationSimulation - Gameplay simplification from original

PRIMARY SOURCES

📚Source Card #1

Thebes Game Board (MMA 16.10.475)

Tomb of Reny-Seneb, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Published: c. 1814-1805 BCE

Used for: Primary artifact for board layout, hole positions, portal connections, and piece design

📚Source Card #2

Ancient Egyptians at Play: Board Games Across Borders

Crist, W., Dunn-Vaturi, A., & de Voogt, A., Bloomsbury Academic

Published: 2016

Used for: Comprehensive analysis of Dogs & Jackals including archaeological context, board variations, and reconstructed rules

📚Source Card #3

Historical Development of Egyptian Board Games

Piccione, Peter, University of Chicago

Published: 1990

Used for: Comparative analysis with Senet and other race games, religious context of gaming in ancient Egypt

CHANGELOG

2026.01 - Initial release with portal-based rule reconstruction
Future - Additional board variations and regional rule sets planned
Play DOGS & JACKALS