“Game boards from predynastic Egypt (c. 3000 BCE)”
Multiple excavations, Various museums including British Museum, Cairo Museum
Published: c. 3000 BCE (artifacts)
Used for: Board design, spiral layout, number of segments
Archaeological evidence and scholarly research
Mehen presents a unique challenge: while we have many physical game boards, no written rules have survived. Our implementation is based on archaeological evidence, comparative analysis with other ancient games, and scholarly reconstructions.
Study actual game boards from museum collections
Compare with other ancient race games
Review academic reconstructions and theories
Test for historical plausibility and enjoyment
Multiple excavations, Various museums including British Museum, Cairo Museum
Published: c. 3000 BCE (artifacts)
Used for: Board design, spiral layout, number of segments
Peter A. Piccione, University of Charleston
Published: 1990
Used for: Understanding piece types, including lion and ball pieces
Irving Finkel (Editor), British Museum
Published: 2007
Used for: Comparative analysis with other ancient race games
Timothy Kendall, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
Published: 2007
Used for: Rule reconstruction methodology and historical context
Unlike the Royal Game of Ur, no ancient texts describing Mehen's rules have been discovered. The gameplay you experience here is a modern reconstruction based on physical evidence and scholarly analysis. While we strive for historical plausibility, the actual rules played by ancient Egyptians may have been different. This uncertainty is part of what makes Mehen fascinating — it's a game we can see but whose exact mechanics remain a mystery.